views
- Clean Tech's Mid-Year Report: Many Battles Ahead
- Gulf Oil Disaster: Fleeting News Headline or Defining Watershed Moment?
- Climate Action and Senate Politics Don't Mix
- Clean Energy Outlook: Significant Question Marks Dot the Landscape
- Obama's Nuclear Madness and the Future of 'Clean'
- State of the Clean-Tech Union: Troubled Waters Ahead?
- Don't think of a Solar Panel
- Beyond Copenhagen: Those Who Innovate and Inspire
- Clean-Energy Wish List: Six Federal Policy Actions to Ensure U.S. Leadership
- Innovation is Imperative - Especially in Thinking
- Summer's Over, Now Let's Get Back to Work
- Utilities: Scaling the Clean-Tech Mountain
- Washington Acts While Wall Street Waits
- Winds of Change Blowing Through the Heartland and Beyond
- Changing Climate: Carbon Tax Gaining Momentum over Cap-and-Trade?
- Brave New Worlds: The Expanding Reach of Clean Tech
- Getting Serious About Clean-Energy Stimulus
- Obama-Era Carbon Policy Must Transform Old Divisions
- The Best of Times / Worst of Times Balance Sheet
- Muito Obrigado, Brasil
- Turning the Page: Financing our Clean-Energy Future
- Perilous Times Call for Transformational Thinking, and Action
- Inflate This: Conservation and Efficiency Are Key to Our Energy Future
- From the Heartland, a Microcosm of Energy Transition
Clean-Energy Wish List: Six Federal Policy Actions to Ensure U.S. Leadership
Ron Pernick
As we move toward climate talks in Copenhagen, and energy policy is
being debated and formulated within the Senate and House, I thought it
was a good time to take a look at my own clean-energy policy wish
list. In a recent Clean Edge/Green America report, we highlighted five financing models that could serve the U.S. on
the capital investment side of the equation. But to remain competitive
on the global clean-energy playing field, and to ensure our status as
the world's preeminent innovation nation, the U.S. must implement
aggressive federal policy and regulatory actions.
Here are six federal policy actions that I believe would go a long way
in moving the clean-energy needle forward -- and ensuring America's
status as
clean-tech leader, rather than laggard.
1) Enact a Federal Renewable Energy Standard
(RES). For the past decade, states have been in a leadership role
when it comes to renewable energy standards (RES) and renewable
portfolio standards (RPS). California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger
recently issued an executive order to increase the state's RPS to 33
percent by 2020. While I want to guarantee that states continue to
have the right to manage and implement their own standards, a federal
RES would go a long way in providing guidance and guaranteeing that
more states join the movement. We believe that a minimum federal RES
of 20-25 percent by 2020 or 2025, designed with enforcement mechanisms
-- real incentives for succeeding and penalties for failing -- is
doable and desirable. And renewables must be clearly defined. There's
a reason why 26 states out of 29 with RPS, like California and
Illinois, don't include nuclear power and "clean coal" in their
standards toolkit. I advise the U.S. federal government do the same.
2) Ensure Government Procurement of Clean Energy,
Green Buildings, and Energy Efficiency. The federal government has
often been a leader in moving markets via its procurement decisions.
It has happened with aerospace, transistors, and other technologies in
the past. As one of the largest single purchasing entities in the
world, its purchasing decisions can have a significant impact on
success vs. failure for an industry. Recently, the federal government
has made some significant strides in aligning its purchasing with
sustainable practices, like Obama's recent energy efficiency, resource
conservation, and sustainability directive for federal agencies. But
now government agencies must not only create their own plans, but meet
targets, offer transparent information, and influence suppliers. They
would do well to take a page out of Wal-Mart's current sustainability
initiatives, in which vendors need to supply to certain standards or
get out of the way.
3) Overhaul energy subsidies to shift from imported
fossil fuels to domestic clean energy. Historically, the U.S. has
supported energy industries that are already relatively mature. The
U.S. still provides hundreds of millions of dollars in subsidies to
oil and gas industries that are controlled by some of the wealthiest
companies on the planet. I believe that the federal government should
reassess this focus on supporting profitable fossil fuel industries,
and shift these subsidies to the industries of the future: solar,
wind, geothermal, energy efficiency, and the like.
4) Improve Energy Efficiency Standards Across the
Board. Energy efficiency, often called the "fifth fuel," is
usually the least expensive option for reducing energy demand. The
federal government can go a long way in reducing energy use,
greenhouse gas emissions, and U.S. reliance on foreign fossil fuel
supplies by setting aggressive efficiency standards for vehicles,
buildings, appliances, HVAC, industrial motors, and more. Many of the
energy efficiency provisions in the Waxman-Markey (ACES) bill have
been hailed for their job-creating, energy-reducing impacts -- and I
agree that this is one of the best areas to focus efforts.
5) Put a Price on Carbon. For a number of reasons,
this remains the most contentious policy recommendation. But I see
three major options that would begin to bring the U.S. into alignment
with other nations that are supporting climate policies and working to
cap emissions. The following ideas are not mutually exclusive --
indeed a combination of the following could go a long way in putting a
price on carbon and setting an enforceable cap:
a. Implement a transparent cap-and-trade system
that has checks and balances to guarantee that the system results in
meaningful carbon reduction.
b. Deploy a carbon tax along with a clear and enforceable
cap -- and make sure the tax is near revenue-neutral. In other words,
after a set amount of money is funneled into clean-energy development
and deployment -- say $15 billion per year for a decade --
return the balance of tax receipts to individual taxpayers.
c. Retain the right for the EPA to move forward
with regulating carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions
under the Clean Air Act -- just like it does with other
pollutants. The Supreme Court has ruled that the EPA has the right to
regulate greenhouse gas emissions, and we believe the tool should be
used if necessary. It has worked effectively for reducing other
emissions.
6) Support the Build Out of New, Reliable Electric
Grids. The electric grids in the U.S. are outdated and
deteriorating. By making the build out of new electric transmission
lines and smart grids a national priority, the U.S. would be investing
in our collective future. Policies would need to streamline and speed
the process of building new lines to renewable generation sources --
and the federal government could play a supportive role in setting
open standards for smart-grid devices and networks that make the grid
more intelligent, efficient, and reliable. Industry and government
groups played a central role in setting the open standards that
enabled the build out of the Internet, and they can do the same thing
for the smart grid.
I firmly believe that we can meet our future energy needs with
conservation and efficiency; the build out of a smarter more reliable
21st century grid (including electrified transportation); and the
deployment and integration of renewables such as solar, wind, and
geothermal along with advanced
energy-storage technologies. This is not some far flung pipe dream,
but an achievable reality being pursued by smart, technologically
savvy global stakeholders. But shifts in policy, like those
highlighted above, will be required to meet these ambitious and
critical national clean-tech goals. If the U.S. wishes to lead and
innovate, the Federal government must act now.
-------
Ron Pernick is cofounder and managing director of Clean Edge, Inc. and
coauthor of The Clean Tech
Revolution.