views
- State of the Clean-Tech Union: Troubled Waters Ahead?
- Don't think of a Solar Panel
- Beyond Copenhagen: Those Who Innovate and Inspire
- Clean-Energy Wish List: Six Federal Policy Actions to Ensure U.S. Leadership
- Innovation is Imperative - Especially in Thinking
- Summer's Over, Now Let's Get Back to Work
- Utilities: Scaling the Clean-Tech Mountain
- Washington Acts While Wall Street Waits
- Winds of Change Blowing Through the Heartland and Beyond
- Changing Climate: Carbon Tax Gaining Momentum over Cap-and-Trade?
- Brave New Worlds: The Expanding Reach of Clean Tech
- Getting Serious About Clean-Energy Stimulus
- Obama-Era Carbon Policy Must Transform Old Divisions
- The Best of Times / Worst of Times Balance Sheet
- Muito Obrigado, Brasil
- Turning the Page: Financing our Clean-Energy Future
- Perilous Times Call for Transformational Thinking, and Action
- Inflate This: Conservation and Efficiency Are Key to Our Energy Future
- From the Heartland, a Microcosm of Energy Transition
- Signposts to a Clean-Energy Future: Two New Reports Shine a Light on Potential High-Growth Pathways for the U.S.
- Our New 'Greatest Generation' Opportunity
- Cafe Musings (or How Clean Tech is Becoming Ubiquitous)
- Five Years In, A Hybrid Owner Looks Back — and Ahead
- The Future Ain't What Is Used to Be
Innovation is Imperative - Especially in Thinking
Clint Wilder
For the past three years, I've been fortunate enough to attend the
Clinton Global Initiative annual meeting in New York. At this year's
event in September, CGI altered its traditional format of organizing
the conference along the lines of "What" areas most need to be
addressed in the world – energy/climate change, global health, poverty
alleviation, and education – to focus on the "How" of innovation,
infrastructure, human capital, and financing. All are critical to
success in meeting the world’s challenges, but in the energy/climate
change sector, none is more imperative than innovation.
By innovation I don't mean just technology breakthroughs like
large-scale battery storage or solar cell efficiency, though there's
no denying the need for those. More important is innovation in
thinking – throughout business, finance, and particularly
government. We will never achieve the necessary goals of energy
transformation and global carbon reduction without it.
We will move to a clean-energy future; the only question is when. But
the enemies of this transformation are not just the usual suspects of
climate change deniers, coal and oil lobbyists, and backward-thinking
politicians. They are also complacency, a political system often ruled
by inertia, and the curse of incremental change. "If all we do is
simply improve what we've done in the past," said Cisco chairman and
CEO John Chambers on a CGI panel, "we're not going to get very far."
It's one reason why Cisco has embraced a whole new industry,
smart-grid technology, with such fervor.
Or as Nobel laureate Paul Krugman put it in a recent New York Times
column on opposition to action on climate change, "It's not just a
matter of vested interests. It's also a matter of vested ideas."
Eleven months after what seemed to be a transformational U.S.
presidential election, our internal political debates, and the news
media that thrives on covering and instigating them, still seem mired
in old ways of thinking.
Innovation used to be heroic in America, with breakthrough icons like
Henry Ford, Andy Grove, and Steve Jobs lauded and revered. But when it
comes to true innovation in energy – the type of orders-of-magnitude
increase in clean power and transportation that we’re going to need
– the culture of "no we can't" still seems to rule the day. The U.S.
Chamber of Commerce's opposition to meaningful action on climate
change, for example, has recently caused PG&E, Exelon, PNM
Resources, and Nike to resign their memberships or board positions,
and I expect even more forward-thinking member companies will follow.
Innovation resisters like the Chamber have helped perpetuate the myth
of massive cost increases and widescale disruptions from even a modest
carbon cap-and-trade system, and I fear that the average American
believes them.
Which brings us to the global economy's (if not world history's) most
dramatic example of transformation, for better or worse: China. As
most of the clean-tech industry now knows, China has turned its
economic development turbochargers to solar PV manufacturing, wind
farm construction, efficient and electric vehicles, and other critical
clean-energy sectors. "What I admire about China is the mindset of
can-do," said Duke Energy CEO Jim Rogers, who at CGI announced a joint
technology development deal with Chinese energy giant ENN Group
encompassing solar, biofuels, smart grid, efficiency, carbon-capturing
algae and other areas. "They're not looking for excuses as to why we
can't do something."
China's admirers among American CEOs don't stop there. General
Electric's Jeffrey Immelt likes the long-range view of China's series
of five-year plans that have overhauled the nation’s infrastructure.
"What we have (in the U.S.) is a systems problem," he said. "If we
want a clean-energy future, we're talking about 20- to 40-year
investments. You need standards set by government, and there must be
public-private partnerships. The world's fastest-growing economy is a
good model."
Dow Chemical CEO Andrew Liveris believes that China has aligned
education and workforce training with its national goals far better
than the U.S. "It's a success model that combines industrial and
energy policy with education policy, where science, technology,
engineering, and math all play a role," he said. "In that sense, I
think that the United States is still a developing nation."
Ponder that for a moment, especially if you're old enough (like me) to
remember China's days of communism under Mao Tse-Tung. I sure never
thought I'd live to see the day when the CEOs of two of America's
largest companies hold up China as an economic role model.
But that's the kind of dramatic, I-can-hardly-believe-it change that
comes from new ways of thinking. A few years ago, who would have
believed that Wal-Mart Stores would become a world leader in
clean-energy use and particularly efficiency? "We came to realize that
sustainability is now part of our business model and our message to
customers – save money and live better," said Wal-Mart CEO Mike Duke.
"The more we looked at it through that set of filters, we wanted to
move even faster. That's when you really start becoming more
innovative." Duke went on to agree with former President Bill Clinton
that an 80 percent CO2 reduction by 2050 will be a positive, not
negative, economic transformation for the U.S.
From Beijing to Bentonville, the lessons and inspirations are out
there. Whether it's a price on carbon or a dramatically overhauled
national electric transmission system, we need game-changing ideas
implemented, and soon. But we can't underestimate the intransigence
that we're up against. Kleiner Perkins partner Ajit Nazre put it
simply at the recent Renewable Energy Finance Forum-West conference in
San Francisco: "Energy is a global $6 trillion market with
historically little innovation." That, and government policies and
processes that help protect the status quo, create a powerful force
against change. To move that mountain, we're going to need
unprecedented creative thinking from clean-tech innovators in
technology, finance, and policy across the globe.
------------
Wilder is Clean Edge's contributing editor, co-author of The
Clean Tech Revolution, and a blogger about clean-tech issues for
the Green section of The Huffington Post. E-mail him at wilder@cleanedge.com.